![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Tilføj hvilken som helst søgning, på hvilken som helst side, til søgefeltet.Adblock Plus anvendes på over 500 millioner enheder og er således verdens mest populære ad blocker. ![]() Absolute Enable Right Click & Copy 1.3.4.Button opens the Add-ons Manager in a new tab and can be placed on any toolbar including the Add-on Bar Toolbar button to launch the Add-ons Manager.about:addons Launcher 1.1.1-signed.1-signed.Instant Save for Instagram and Flickr: Įxported with Share Extensions for Google Chrome™ - Īpplikation: Firefox 52.9.0 (20180621064021) I mean, if the supplier can kick off what looks to be a definite new line of integrated computing - such as Windows Phone (Windows 10) and complete with a new Sony-Ericsson smartphone designed for it - and then simply drop it all "just like that", where the heck does that leave the users who have been suckered into using it? If they'd said at the outset (like Google tend to do) that these are trials or Betas, then that could at least be a little more honest, but no, they didn't elect to do that and we have all read the message, loud and clear: "Screw the users/customers". This is one of the concerns that I have regarding my tendency for increasing reliance on MS Office OneNote. So, whether you are using Quantum, or something else, the question might better be: How can my processes be made more resilient and more certain of avoiding falling into the trap of relying on transient proprietary backup solutions from unreliable/fickle providers? mhtml files), which are indexable/searchable via WDS (Windows Desktop Search) and GDS (Google Desktop Search), etc. This has generally worked well, though I thought I had been caught out when Mozilla made the Scrapbook extension obsolete, but I've overcome that hurdle with newer technology - i.e., saving webpages as. So, from a user perspective, I have taken a relatively independent path that is based on a complete lack of trust of the browser providers/supporters.I consider backup copies of the extension installers to be a "lowest common denominator" approach - i.e., rather than a backup tool like FEBE (and its restore component). Of course, that will only work if Google don't go down the same path as Mozilla and enforce obsolescence of all/any extensions that they don't approve of on an ongoing basis. However, after the Firefox experience, I was prepared for this, and I am in the habit of saving backup copies of the installers of extension that look as though they might be at risk of unilateral prohibition/deletion by GodMode Google.That was until recently, when Google appeared to be starting with the same control-freak tricks that Mozilla had been up to - in this case, silently switching off one of my fav extensions (so I had to keep switching it on again when I ran Slimjet) and then completely zapping it - this was the excellent BadAdJohnny extension. When I eventually switched to Slimjet - after becoming sick and tired of Mozilla and their control-freak trips, wrecking all that was good about Firefox (for me) - I was happy using the Sync functionality that was built into Slimjet/Chrome.So I was mostly covered, from a backup perspective. So I used Sync instead of FEBE, and - just in case - kept contingency copies of the installers of my fav extensions. I used to use FEBE (at the time when it was the only available extension backup tool, I think), but its development started to lag a little, and then Firefox brought in the Sync functionality, which made FEBE somewhat redundant.I suspect that you might be asking the wrong question here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |